Richard Pulteney, Blandford, [Dorset], to James Edward Smith, 12 [Great] Marlborough Street, London

Item data

Ref No GB-110/JES/COR/24/92
Title Richard Pulteney, Blandford, [Dorset], to James Edward Smith, 12 [Great] Marlborough Street, London
Letter date 4 Dec 1791
Author(s) Richard Pulteney 1730-1801
Number of Pages 3

See full metadata

See comments

Collection home page

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

GB-110/JES/COR/24/92 from Richard Pulteney, Blandford, [Dorset], to James Edward Smith, 12 [Great] Marlborough Street, London (4 December 1791)

Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/24/92 from Richard Pulteney, Blandford, [Dorset], to James Edward Smith, 12 [Great] Marlborough Street, London (4 December 1791) Close

Item data

Item Type: Document
From: Pulteney, Richard
Sent from: Blandford, Dorset
To: Smith, Sir James Edward
Sent to location: London
Summary:

Thanks Smith for sending books, including L'Héritier, encloses bill, clearing his account with Smith; asks after text for Smith's "Spicilegium botanicum" and second part of Gaertner, and price of "Flora cochinchinensis". [Aylmer Bourke] Lambert "greatly enriched" his herbarium by a visit to Lord Bute's garden [John Stuart, 3rd Earl of Bute (1713-1792)], at High Cliff, Hampshire.

Letter date: 4 Dec 1791
Languages: English
Prev Ref No: 24.167
Additional Information:
Note typeNote
Finding AidsDawson, W R (1934). "Catalogue of the manuscripts in the Library of The Linnean Society - Part I. The Smith papers: The correspondence and miscellaneous papers of Sir James Edward Smith", London: Linnean Society.
Related MaterialSmith, J E, (1791-1792). "Spicilegium botanicum, Fasc. I & II." London: [privately]. Gaertner, J, (1788-1805). "De fructibus et seminibus plantarum ..." Stutgardia: Typ. Academia Carolina. Loureiro, J de, (1790). "Flora cochinchinensis: sistens plantas in regno Cochinchina nascentes, quibus accedunt aliae observatae in Sinensi imperio, Africa Orientali... Labore, ac studio Joannis de Loureiro..." Ulyssipona: Acad. R. Scient.
AdditionalSmith replied 9 [Dec 1791]