Item data
Ref No
GB-110/JES/COR/20/91
Title
William Bingley, Arnold, near Nottingham, [Nottinghamshire], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk]
Letter date
3 Aug 1800
Author(s)
William Bingley 1774-1823
Number of Pages
4
See full metadata
See comments
Collection home page
Actions (login required)
Edit Item |
GB-110/JES/COR/20/91 from William Bingley, Arnold, near Nottingham, [Nottinghamshire], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk] (3 August 1800)
Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/20/91 from William Bingley, Arnold, near Nottingham, [Nottinghamshire], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk] (3 August 1800) Close
Item data
Item Type:
Document
From:
Bingley, William
Sent from:
Arnold, Nottinghamshire
To:
Smith, Sir James Edward
Sent to location:
Norwich, Norfolk
Summary:
Details of the Matlock, [Derbyshire], 'Achillea', acquired from person who communicated it to [James] Sowerby. Mrs Sherbrooke cautions against adopting new plants from Matlock neighbourhood as several years some gentlemen had scattered seeds of exotics in various places. Does not consider the 'Fumaria lutea' of "English botany" a native of Fountains Abbey, [Yorkshire]; thinks the 'Impatiens noli-tangere' on banks of river at Studley Park was purposely sown; doubts over 'Daphne cneorum' of Snowdon.
Writing a history of music and then to work on his popular natural history book. Asks if Linnean Society books can travel into the country. Requests exotic plants for Mrs Sherbrooke's almost completed greenhouse.
Letter date:
3 Aug 1800
Languages:
English
Prev Ref No:
20.146
Additional Information:
Note type | Note |
---|---|
UNSPECIFIED | Smith, J E, and Sowerby, J, (1790-1814). "English botany" London. |
UNSPECIFIED | Dawson, W R (1934). "Catalogue of the manuscripts in the Library of The Linnean Society - Part I. The Smith papers: The correspondence and miscellaneous papers of Sir James Edward Smith", London: Linnean Society. |
UNSPECIFIED | Smith replied 1 Nov [1800] |
UNSPECIFIED | N.B. Letter GB-110/JES/COR/20/89 is out of sequence with those around it (GB-110/JES/COR/20/88 to GB-110/JES/COR/20/92) due to an incorrect date on the letter, which should read 1801 rather than 1800. Chronologically this letter should be placed between GB-110/JES/COR/20/91 and GB-110/JES/COR/20/92. |