Sir Thomas Frankland, Exmouth, [Devon], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk]

Item data

Ref No GB-110/JES/COR/15/6
Title Sir Thomas Frankland, Exmouth, [Devon], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk]
Letter date 18 Nov 1799
Author(s) Sir Thomas, 6th baronet Frankland 1750-1831
Number of Pages 4

See full metadata

See comments

Collection home page

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

GB-110/JES/COR/15/6 from Sir Thomas Frankland, Exmouth, [Devon], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk] (18 November 1799)

Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/15/6 from Sir Thomas Frankland, Exmouth, [Devon], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk] (18 November 1799) Close

Item data

Item Type: Document
From: Frankland, Sir Thomas
Sent from: Exmouth, Devon
To: Smith, Sir James Edward
Sent to location: Norwich, Norfolk
Summary:

In Exmouth on account of his daughter; she has been unwell for months and recently more so though believes her lungs are not affected and that the disorder is nervous. His sister has received great benefit from taking foxglove under Dr Moncrieffe though just received letter that a fresh tubercule is inflaming. Beddoes currently has five ladies under his care, each in a hammock in a close room with an Alderney cow.
Will send any marine plants he finds to [James] Sowerby though presently none are washed up and the rocks are barren except for 'Fucus vesiculorus' and 'Ulva compressa', 'Rubia' on cliffs, and '[Calystegia] soldanella', 'Crygium campestre', 'Cuphorbia' and he supposes [William] Hudson's 'Ononis repens' on sand banks between cliffs and beach. Complains that having expected to live on John Dory can get nothing but small whitings and herrings every two or three days.

Letter date: 18 Nov 1799
Languages: English
Prev Ref No: 15.12
Additional Information:
Note typeNote
Finding AidsDawson, W R (1934). "Catalogue of the manuscripts in the Library of The Linnean Society - Part I. The Smith papers: The correspondence and miscellaneous papers of Sir James Edward Smith", London: Linnean Society.
AdditionalSmith replied 24 [Nov 1799]