Samuel Goodenough, Rose Castle, Carlisle, [Cumberland], to Sir James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk]

Item data

Ref No GB-110/JES/COR/12/62
Title Samuel Goodenough, Rose Castle, Carlisle, [Cumberland], to Sir James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk]
Letter date 6 Sep 1820
Author(s) Samuel Goodenough 1743-1827
Number of Pages 4

See full metadata

See comments

Collection home page

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

GB-110/JES/COR/12/62 from Samuel Goodenough, Rose Castle, Carlisle, [Cumberland], to Sir James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk] (6 September 1820)

Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/12/62 from Samuel Goodenough, Rose Castle, Carlisle, [Cumberland], to Sir James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk] (6 September 1820) Close

Item data

Item Type: Document
From: Goodenough, Samuel
Sent from: Carlisle, Cumberland
To: Smith, Sir James Edward
Sent to location: Norwich, Norfolk
Summary:

Thanks for Smith's letter of 28 August. Discussion of several stately homes: enjoyed Smith's account of the Duke of Rutland's old "magnificent" mansion [Belvoir Castle, Leicestershire ?], unsure why noblemen feel it necessary to rebuild such places but concedes that expensive and extravagant houses help the economy; glad to hear Smith speak well of Lord Mountnorris [George Annesley], never understood "how that scoundrel [John Bellenden] Gawler [(1764-1842), soldier] was let into his house" [in 1796 Annesley won damages from Gawler for committing adultery with his wife]. Asks if Smith had to pay 20 shillings for entry to Whiteknights [Berkshire home of George Spencer-Churchill, 5th Duke of Marlborough]; imagines the 1100 feet long walk of 'Robinia viscosa' must be a wonderful. Shocked by the fall of the once "resplendent" Spencer-Churchills; recalls that his grandfather half ruined himself trying to secure the family and Goodenough thinks the present Duke "below contempt". Glad Smith enjoyed the British portraits in the British gallery. Followed Smith in visiting Claremont [house in Surrey bought for Princess Charlotte and Prince Leopold]; Prince Leopold is "so affable, so very civil, so attentative, & withal truly princely".
Agrees with Smith that Sir Humphry Davy will be chosen as new Royal Society president but doubts it can keep its superior status; believes Sir Joseph Banks was wrong allowing the establishment of the Animal Chemistry Society as now only the chemical and algebraical pursuits are left to it, fears consequences of Davy's wife becoming involved.
The trial of the Queen [Caroline (1768-1821), wife of George IV]: shocked by the "filthy memoirs" about her which are appearing, thinks bishops should not be allowed at such recitals; the radical papers call her "pure as unsunned snow [and] spotless innocence"; fears it will continue till his return to London; relates a jest by one of the lords who when compelled to take off his hat to the Queen said "hurrah, the Queen for ever, & may all your wives be like her".

Letter date: 6 Sep 1820
Languages: English
Prev Ref No: 12.114
Additional Information:
Note typeNote
AdditionalSmith replied 22 [Sep 1820]
Related MaterialFor letter from William Smith to James Edward Smith on Queen Caroline's conduct see JES/COR/9/50; and further letters from Goodenough on same and her trial see JES/COR/12/59-61; JES/COR/12/63-66; JES/COR/12/69.