Richard Pulteney, Blandford, [Dorset], to James Edward Smith, 12 Great Marlborough Street, [London]

Item data

Ref No GB-110/JES/COR/24/82
Title Richard Pulteney, Blandford, [Dorset], to James Edward Smith, 12 Great Marlborough Street, [London]
Letter date 4 Feb 1790
Author(s) Richard Pulteney 1730-1801
Number of Pages 4

See full metadata

See comments

Collection home page

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

GB-110/JES/COR/24/82 from Richard Pulteney, Blandford, [Dorset], to James Edward Smith, 12 Great Marlborough Street, [London] (4 February 1790)

Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/24/82 from Richard Pulteney, Blandford, [Dorset], to James Edward Smith, 12 Great Marlborough Street, [London] (4 February 1790) Close

Item data

Item Type: Document
From: Pulteney, Richard
Sent from: Blandford, Dorset
To: Smith, Sir James Edward
Sent to location: London
Summary:

Thanks Smith for offering to procure botanical books for him; requests L'Héritier's "Sertum anglicum"; directions for sending. Anxious to procure those books quoted by Linnaeus, particularly Dalechamp and Brunssaling. He is about to publish his "Sketches of the progress of botany" [(1790)], orginally intended as an introduction to a large scale English flora.

Letter date: 4 Feb 1790
Languages: English
Prev Ref No: 24.149
Additional Information:
Note typeNote
Finding AidsDawson, W R (1934). "Catalogue of the manuscripts in the Library of The Linnean Society - Part I. The Smith papers: The correspondence and miscellaneous papers of Sir James Edward Smith", London: Linnean Society.
Related MaterialL'Héritier de Brutelle, C L, (1788). "Sertum Anglicum seu plantae rariores quae in hortis juxta Londinum, imprimis in Horto Regio Kewensi excoluntur, ab ... 1786 ad 1787 observatae; Cornus. Specimen botanicum sistens descriptiones et icones specierum corni minus cognatarum." Paris: Typis Didot. Pulteney, R, (1790). "Historical and biographical sketches of the progress of botany in England from its origin to the introduction of the Linnaean system." London: Cadell.
AdditionalSmith replied 18 [Feb 1790]