James Edward Smith, Paris, [France], to James Smith, Market Place, Norwich, [Norfolk], Angleterre

Item data

Ref No GB-110/JES/COR/19/36
Title James Edward Smith, Paris, [France], to James Smith, Market Place, Norwich, [Norfolk], Angleterre
Letter date 13 Sep 1786
Author(s) Sir James Edward Smith 1759-1828
Number of Pages 4

See full metadata

See comments

Collection home page

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

GB-110/JES/COR/19/36 from James Edward Smith, Paris, [France], to James Smith, Market Place, Norwich, [Norfolk], Angleterre (13 September 1786)

Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/19/36 from James Edward Smith, Paris, [France], to James Smith, Market Place, Norwich, [Norfolk], Angleterre (13 September 1786) Close

Item data

Item Type: Document
From: Smith, Sir James Edward
Sent from: Paris, France
To: Smith, James
Sent to location: Norwich, Norfolk
Summary:

Received his father's letter of 24 August [1786], has not yet received Lady Jernegan's packet. Has now given up remaining in Paris and intends to go to Montpelier with Broussonet, and then on to Genoa to visit the Marquis Durazzo and Turin, and return through Switzerland before returning to Paris, to arrive in London in April. Paris "wonderfully like" Edinburgh in some respects. Beauty of some of the places in Paris; notes that the marble statues are not damaged by the populace; no "perfectly pleasing morsel of architecture"; odd monuments to monarchs; picture collections. Asks for news of the Lord Chancellor, said to be in Paris. Hopes his father not displeased at criticism of his work in "Critical Review" for June; he is flattered by it.

Letter date: 13 Sep 1786
Languages: English
Prev Ref No: 19.95
Additional Information:
Note typeNote
Related MaterialFor James Smith's reply of 21 September 1786, see JES/COR/19/37.
Finding AidsDawson, W R (1934). "Catalogue of the manuscripts in the Library of The Linnean Society - Part I. The Smith papers: The correspondence and miscellaneous papers of Sir James Edward Smith", London: Linnean Society.
AdditionalJames Smith replied 21 [Sep 1786]