James Edward Smith, Edinburgh, to James Smith

Item data

Ref No GB-110/JES/COR/19/28
Title James Edward Smith, Edinburgh, to James Smith
Letter date 31 Dec 1782/2 Jan 1783
Author(s) Sir James Edward Smith 1759-1828
Number of Pages 6

See full metadata

See comments

Collection home page

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

GB-110/JES/COR/19/28 from James Edward Smith, Edinburgh, to James Smith (31 December 1782)

Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/19/28 from James Edward Smith, Edinburgh, to James Smith (31 December 1782) Close

Item data

Item Type: Document
From: Smith, Sir James Edward
Sent from: Edinburgh
To: Smith, James
Summary:

Thanks for parcel and letters from his father, mother, Frank [Smith's brother], and Sally. Responds to his father's letter of 28 November [1782]; defends Mr Cooper. Reassures his father he shall never disrespect any advice given. Offers to acquire fossil collection for Dr Manning. Oats scarce in Scotland, collections are being made for the poor. Just received his father's letter of 26 December [1782]. Their Natural History Society going on well; they are to have 4 annual presidents, hopes to be one of them; just submitted a paper on the "Phenomena of Vegetable Odours"; often speaks in the Medical Society. He has won Dr [John] Hope's medal [for best Scottish herbarium]; he was the only one to enter but complimented on the collection, which was larger than that of Dr Parsons', the last successful one. Congratules Richard, [Smith's brother], on the prizes he has won, and admires his drawings. Just attended funeral of son of Dr Reid of Glasgow; grief of the family; peculiar death, which came on at crisis of unsevere fever, from Tympanites.

Letter date: 31 Dec 1782/2 Jan 1783
Languages: English
Prev Ref No: 19.65
Additional Information:
Note typeNote
Finding AidsDawson, W R (1934). "Catalogue of the manuscripts in the Library of The Linnean Society - Part I. The Smith papers: The correspondence and miscellaneous papers of Sir James Edward Smith", London: Linnean Society.
AdditionalJames Smith replied 28 Feb [1783]