Mary Watson-Wentworth to James Edward Smith, Great Marlborough Street, [London]

Item data

Ref No GB-110/JES/COR/15/109
Title Mary Watson-Wentworth to James Edward Smith, Great Marlborough Street, [London]
Letter date 26 May 1792
Author(s) Mary Watson- Wentworth 1735-1804
Number of Pages 6

See full metadata

See comments

Collection home page

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

GB-110/JES/COR/15/109 from Mary Watson-Wentworth to James Edward Smith, Great Marlborough Street, [London] (26 May 1792)

Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/15/109 from Mary Watson-Wentworth to James Edward Smith, Great Marlborough Street, [London] (26 May 1792) Close

Item data

Item Type: Document
From: Wentworth, Mary Watson-
To: Smith, Sir James Edward
Sent to location: London
Summary:

Sorry to receive account of Smith's ill health. Made herself ill after staying at her house in Stratton Street, [London], and visiting the ill Mrs [Elizabeth] Weddell, who was much better and more composed than she expected. Hopes Smith enjoys his trip to Matlock, [Derbyshire], and [Richard] Salisbury.
Wishes Smith had sent a name for her 'Geranium', the seeds came from Captain Rhio via [Harvey] Spragg. Received Botany Bay seeds from Lady [Amelia] Hume and additional seeds from Governor [Arthur] Phillip [(1738-1814), first governer of New South Wales] via John King and [Sir Joseph] Banks; they were packed very badly. Asks if [John] White [(1757-1832), surgeon in New South Wales] is returning to England. Asks Smith to look again for drawing of Lord Charlemont's Room and the Epitaph she sent him. Smith can keep the Voltaire volumes for longer and she will read the sermons Smith speaks of if he leaves them at her London house.

Letter date: 26 May 1792
Languages: English
Prev Ref No: 15.206
Additional Information:
Note typeNote
Finding AidsDawson, W R (1934). "Catalogue of the manuscripts in the Library of The Linnean Society - Part I. The Smith papers: The correspondence and miscellaneous papers of Sir James Edward Smith", London: Linnean Society.
AdditionalSmith replied 26 May 1792