Samuel Goodenough to Sir James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk]

Item data

Ref No GB-110/JES/COR/12/24
Title Samuel Goodenough to Sir James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk]
Letter date 26 Jul 1816
Author(s) Samuel Goodenough 1743-1827
Number of Pages 4

See full metadata

See comments

Collection home page

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

GB-110/JES/COR/12/24 from Samuel Goodenough to Sir James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk] (26 July 1816)

Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/12/24 from Samuel Goodenough to Sir James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk] (26 July 1816) Close

Item data

Item Type: Document
From: Goodenough, Samuel
To: Smith, Sir James Edward
Sent to location: Norwich, Norfolk
Summary:

Constant rain in Cumberland after a substantial dry period. Admires agricultural meetings, especially when they are purely agricultural like [Thomas William] Coke's, and not politicised as they are in Cumberland. Pleased that the House of Buckingham has "so fair a promise in Lord Nugent".
Fears potential civil unrest in the countryside following the harvest as the wages of labourers have not fallen, so farmers will be forced to employ fewer hands and in consequence many will be unemployed. Goodenough thinks it better for all to be employed regardless of the conditions, notes that manufacturers' wages are uncommonly low. Does not like either the Indian or Algerian wars [Third Anglo-Maratha war, 1816-1819, and Bombardment of Algiers, 1816]; has little confidence in Lord Moira's judgement [Francis Edward Rawdon-Hastings, 1st Marquess of Hastings (1754-1826), Governor-General of India 1813-1823].
Goodenough's son, Edmund, had a troublesome rheumatic fever but is now recovered. Edmund went to Malvern where he was puzzled by the variety of 'Ervum tetrasperum' with footstalks with only one flower. Goodenough does not recollect seeing Smith's variety of '[Iris] xiphium'.

Letter date: 26 Jul 1816
Languages: English
Prev Ref No: 12.41
Additional Information:
Note typeNote
Publn NoteSmith, P (ed.), (1832). "Memoir and correspondence of... Sir James Edward Smith" London: Longman, vol 1, pp.598-599.
AdditionalSmith replied 29 Aug [1816]