George Williams, Oxford, [Oxfordshire], to James Edward Smith

Item data

Ref No GB-110/JES/COR/10/89
Title George Williams, Oxford, [Oxfordshire], to James Edward Smith
Letter date 11 Jan 1799
Author(s) George Williams 1762-1834
Number of Pages 2

See full metadata

See comments

Collection home page

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

GB-110/JES/COR/10/89 from George Williams, Oxford, [Oxfordshire], to James Edward Smith (11 January 1799)

Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/10/89 from George Williams, Oxford, [Oxfordshire], to James Edward Smith (11 January 1799) Close

Item data

Item Type: Document
From: Williams, George
Sent from: Oxford, Oxfordshire
To: Smith, Sir James Edward
Summary:

Has sent Smith the requested specimens of 'Clara' from Bolart's herbarium, which is rapidly decaying. Eager to see [William] Sole's mints ['Mentha'], at present cannot follow his descriptions and would be pleased to see some of his plants reduced "to a more subordinate rank than that of species". Discussion of 'Campanula': considers a variety of 'Campanula rotundifolia' in Oxford Botanic Garden to be 'Campanula rhomboidea' on account of leaves; asks Smith's familiarity with 'Campanula mollis', named by [John] Sibthorp 'C. rupestris'. Received roots of 'Eriocaulon' from northern England, unsure what trivial name to give the species. [James] Sowerby's 'Polygonum bistortum'. Grateful to Smith for gathering the 'Statice' of the Norfolk coast. Requests seeds of 'Melampyrum cristatum' and others, and specimens of new 'Orobanche' except 'Orobanche elatior'.

Letter date: 11 Jan 1799
Languages: English
Prev Ref No: 10.142
Additional Information:
Note typeNote
Finding AidsDawson, W R, (1934). "Catalogue of the manuscripts in the Library of The Linnean Society - Part I. The Smith papers: The correspondence and miscellaneous papers of Sir James Edward Smith", London: Linnean Society.
Related MaterialSole, W, (1798). "Menthae Britannicae: being a new botanical arrangement of all the British mints..." Bath: [printer:] Cruttwell.
AdditionalSmith replied 28 Feb [1799]