Charles Abbot, Bedford, [Bedfordshire], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk]

Item data

Ref No GB-110/JES/COR/1/7
Title Charles Abbot, Bedford, [Bedfordshire], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk]
Letter date 2 Nov 1804
Author(s) Charles Abbot 1761-1817
Number of Pages 4

See full metadata

See comments

Collection home page

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

GB-110/JES/COR/1/7 from Charles Abbot, Bedford, [Bedfordshire], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk] (2 November 1804)

Metadata for GB-110/JES/COR/1/7 from Charles Abbot, Bedford, [Bedfordshire], to James Edward Smith, Norwich, [Norfolk] (2 November 1804) Close

Item data

Item Type: Document
From: Abbot, Charles
Sent from: Bedford, Bedfordshire
To: Smith, Sir James Edward
Sent to location: Norwich, Norfolk
Summary:

[Samuel] Dickenson, "who prepared the botanical part of a new history of Staffordshire", has told [John Russell, 6th] Duke of Bedford he believes 'Salix russelliana' to be 'Salix fragilis'. Bedford has asked Abbot to compare the two from "Flora Britannica" and [William] Withering's book. Abbot's observations, which he asks Smith to confirm. Has sent 'Thlaspi campestre' to [James] Sowerby. Has good stations for 'Senecis viscosus', 'Dianthus armeria', 'Rumex sanguineus' and 'Allium carinatum'.

Letter date: 2 Nov 1804
Languages: English
Prev Ref No: 1.12
Additional Information:
Note typeNote
Finding AidsDawson, W R, (1934). "Catalogue of the manuscripts in the Library of The Linnean Society - Part I. The Smith papers: The correspondence and miscellaneous papers of Sir James Edward Smith", London: Linnean Society.
Related MaterialFor further discussion of 'Salix russelliana' see letters JES/COR/1/4; JES/COR/1/5; JES/COR/2/18; JES/COR/2/23; JES/COR/2/24. Shaw, S, (1798-1801). "History and Antiquities of Staffordshire" London: J. Robson; please note not available from Linnean Society Library. Withering, W, (1776). "A botanical arrangement of all the vegetables naturally growing in Great Britain..." Birmingham: Cadel.
AdditionalSmith replied 4 & 9 [Nov 1804]